Level 3 Autonomous Cars Market - Global Forecast To 2035
商品番号 : SMB-80905
出版社 | MarketsandMarkets |
出版年月 | 2025年6月 |
ページ数 | 57 |
図表数 | 36 |
価格タイプ | シングルユーザライセンス |
価格 | USD 4,950 |
種別 | 英文調査報告書 |
本レポートは、レベル3自動運転車市場を地域別(北米、欧州、アジア太平洋地域)に分析しています。また、レベル3自動運転車を展開する主要OEMや、ティア1やテクノロジー企業などの市場エコシステムにおける他のプレーヤーの競合評価も網羅しています。このレポート調査には、現在の提供内容、他のプレーヤーとの比較、重点分野、計画の詳細な比較分析が含まれています。
The level 3 autonomous vehicles market is projected to grow from 291 thousand units in 2025 to 8.7 million units by 2035 at a CAGR of 40.5%.
レベル3の自動運転車市場は、2025 年の 291,000 台から 2035 年までに 870 万台に増加し、CAGR 40.5% で成長すると予測されています。
Level 3 autonomy is an essential milestone in the overall roadmap for autonomous vehicles. While level 1 and 2 autonomous features have become prevalent in most countries worldwide, level 3 autonomy is picking up relatively slowly. Level 1 & 2 autonomy is primarily driven by the regulatory norms requiring advanced active and passive safety systems in the vehicles complemented by advancements in sensing hardware and software algorithms. On the other hand, level 3 autonomy faces challenges from robust and reliable autonomous suites and the regulatory side, which is reluctant to deploy level 3 autonomous vehicles on public roads. The reason for this gap is the need for exceptional reliability from the vehicle systems (steering, braking, and vehicle electrical system) and uncertainty on the liability of any mishap, potentially scrapping the entire idea of autonomous and automated driving.
レベル3の自動運転は、自動運転車の全体的なロードマップにおける重要なマイルストーンです。レベル1と2の自動運転機能は世界中のほとんどの国で普及していますが、レベル3の自動運転は比較的ゆっくりと普及しています。レベル1と2の自動運転は、主に、センシングハードウェアとソフトウェアアルゴリズムの進歩によって補完された、車両に高度なアクティブセーフティとパッシブセーフティシステムを要求する規制基準によって推進されています。その一方で、レベル3の自動運転は、堅牢で信頼性の高い自動運転スイートと、レベル3の自動運転車を公道に配備することに消極的な規制側からの課題に直面しています。このギャップの理由は、車両システム(ステアリング、ブレーキ、車両電気システム)に並外れた信頼性が求められることと、事故が発生した場合の責任に関する不確実性であり、自動運転と自動運転の概念全体が無駄になる可能性があります。

“Consumer confidence across China and the Middle East to open opportunities for OEMs planning to launch level 3 autonomous vehicles”
Chinese consumers are generally open about adopting advanced vehicle features, including driving technologies. Consumers in China have recently shown a rising interest in Level 2+ and Level 3 features. However, safety concerns are still a major challenge. Recent reports from Chinese automotive media state that while interest in level 3 features is strong—especially among younger, tech-savvy buyers—most mainstream consumers remain cautious. For example, in surveys of budget EV buyers (~100,000 RMB class), safety consistently ranked as the most considerable hesitation.
The most notable strategy of Chinese OEMs like BYD, Xpeng, and NIO is bundling advanced level 2+/level 3 autonomy as standard or low-cost features to stay competitive. This strategy reflects a market where consumers increasingly expect smart-driving features as a baseline—rather than paying a premium. Chinese consumers are open to level 3 tech, especially in higher-end EVs, but demand strong safety training, demos, and regulatory clarity.
“Prioritizing scalable & modular E/E architecture development to emerge as the key to faster shift to autonomous vehicles”
Recent years have witnessed rapid attention toward software-defined vehicles, which essentially are based on next-gen E/E architecture that forms the basis of a flexible and more powerful foundation for autonomous vehicles. Higher autonomy levels require seamless sensors, computing chips, and connectivity integration for better reliability. Thus, developing scalable and modular E/E architecture (such as zonal) becomes the first step for higher autonomy levels. Level 2 autonomy can be deployed upon conventional architectures as they do not have primary requirements around OTA updates, scalability, and feature enhancement. With level 3 autonomous vehicles being the foundation of truly autonomous vehicles, investing in next-gen architecture is the most crucial step towards autonomous mobility and additional revenues. This can be achieved through partnerships with Tier I & tech companies or in-house development. While Tesla is more focused on in-house development of OS and E/E architecture, OEMs such as Volkswagen, Mercedes-Benz, and others are taking a hybrid approach with a major focus on in-house development and also through partnership with Tier I/tech companies.
“Asia Pacific is projected to demonstrate the fastest growth in the level 3 autonomous vehicles market during the forecast period.”
North America (California & Nevada) and Europe (particularly Germany) are leading the level 3 autonomous vehicles market as these are the only markets with level 3 driving deployment and approval. While Japan also allows using level 3 autonomous vehicles on public roads, it has limited use due to Honda’s production of only 100 vehicles. Mercedes-Benz and BMW are leading the market by launching their level 3 autonomous models. This is expected to be followed by OEMs such as Zeekr, Xpeng, BYD, Volkswagen, and Hyundai, with their aggressive efforts for level 3 autonomous vehicle development. This growth is expected to kickstart in the next 2-3 years as Chinese OEMs such as Zeekr, Xpeng, and others plan to launch level 3 autonomous vehicles. It should be noted that Chinese OEMs are focused on gaining mass volume in domestic and international markets. BYD primarily leads this trend by launching its God’s Eye self-driving system. Thus, as the level 3 autonomous vehicle reaches the final development stage, rapid growth can be expected in the country for these vehicles.
In-depth interviews were conducted with CEOs, marketing directors, other innovation and technology directors, and executives from various key organizations operating in this market. Given below is the breakup of interviews:
- By Company Type: Tier I – 24%, Tier II – 67%, and Tier III – 9%
- By Designation: C-Level – 33%, Managers – 52%, and Executives – 15%
- By Region: North America – 26%, Europe – 30%, Asia Pacific – 35%, and ROW – 9%
Mercedes-Benz, BMW, and Honda currently dominate the level 3 autonomous market. Other major players expected to lead the market are Volkswagen, Stellantis, and Hyundai. Chinese OEMs such as BYD, Xpeng, and Zeekr are aggressively working on level 3 autonomous vehicle development, focusing on mass market share gain.

Research Coverage:
The report covers the level 3 autonomous vehicles market in terms of Region (North America, Europe, and Asia Pacific). It also covers the competitive assessment of the major OEMs operating in level 3 autonomous vehicles and other market ecosystem players such as Tier I and tech companies.
This report study includes an in-depth comparative analysis of the current offerings, their comparison with other players, focus areas, and plans.
Key Benefits of Buying the Report:
- The report will help market leaders/new entrants understand the ongoing developments in level 3 autonomous vehicles.
- This report will help stakeholders understand the current offerings and anticipated future plans of the OEMs & Tier I companies, along with separate analyses for global and Chinese players.
- The report will also help stakeholders understand the market pulse and provide information on key market drivers, challenges, and technology analysis.
- The report will also help stakeholders understand the current and future penetration trends of the level 3 autonomous vehicles.
The report provides insight into the following points:
- Analysis of key drivers (Need for improving sensing technologies, focus on positive consumer perception and government safety regulations on safety features mandate, and need for identifying strong potential from subscription packages revenues) and challenges (regulatory skepticism in select markets, lack of clarity on accident/mishap liability, issues with infrastructure readiness)
- Technology Analysis: Detailed insights into ongoing and upcoming technologies and research & development activities in the level 3 autonomous vehicles market
- Competitive Assessment: In-depth assessment of OEM offerings, plans, and strategic developments, analysis for Tier I companies operating in the level 3 autonomous vehicles market
Table of Contents
1 INTRODUCTION 9
1.1 STUDY OBJECTIVES 9
1.2 MARKET DEFINITION 9
1.2.1 INCLUSIONS & EXCLUSIONS 10
1.3 YEARS CONSIDERED 10
1.4 UNIT CONSIDERED 11
1.5 KEY STAKEHOLDERS 11
2 INTRODUCTION TO LEVEL 3 AUTONOMY 12
2.1 INTRODUCTION OF ADAS LEVELS 12
2.2 LEVEL 3 AUTONOMY 12
2.2.1 BASIC DIFFERENTIATION: LEVEL 1 VS. LEVEL 2/2.5 VS. LEVEL 3 13
2.2.2 TECHNICAL COMPARISON: LEVEL 1 VS. LEVEL 2/2.5 VS. LEVEL 3 13
2.2.3 HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE DISTINCTIONS BETWEEN LEVEL 1, 2, AND 3 ADAS 14
2.2.3.1 Sensor suite evolution 14
2.2.3.2 Compute and architecture 14
2.2.3.3 Redundancy and safety 14
3 MARKET OVERVIEW 15
3.1 MARKET DYNAMICS 15
3.1.1 DRIVERS 15
3.1.1.1 Focus on improving sensing technologies 15
3.1.1.2 Positive consumer perception on ADAS systems 17
3.1.1.3 Popularity of subscription packages 18
3.1.2 CHALLENGES 20
3.1.2.1 Lack of clarity on accident/mishap liability 20
3.1.2.2 Liability concerns for major stakeholders 20
3.1.2.3 Issues concerning infrastructure readiness 21
3.1.2.4 Infrastructure limitations in major countries 22
3.2 ADAS NORMS AND REGULATIONS 22
3.2.1 GOVERNMENT REGULATIONS ON SAFETY MANDATES 22
3.2.1.1 Regulatory norms mandating ADAS features 23
3.2.2 REGULATORY SKEPTICISM IN SELECT MARKETS 24
3.2.2.1 Regulatory norms for ADAS in select countries 24
3.3 TECHNOLOGY ANALYSIS 25
3.3.1 LEVEL 3 AUTONOMY HARDWARE 25
3.3.2 SENSOR FUSION TECHNOLOGY FOR LEVEL 3 AUTONOMY 27
3.3.2.1 Deep learning-based sensor fusion 27
3.3.2.2 Artificial intelligence for sensor fusion 28
3.3.3 ROLE OF 5G CONNECTIVITY IN LEVEL 3 AUTONOMY 29
3.4 ECOSYSTEM FOR OVERALL ADAS AND AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES 30
3.5 MNM INSIGHTS INTO HIGH-PERFORMANCE CHIPS POWERING NEXT-GEN ADAS AND AUTONOMY 30
3.5.1 COMPUTING UNITS FOR ADAS APPLICATIONS 31
3.6 MNM INSIGHTS INTO ADVANCEMENTS TO LEVEL 4 AUTONOMY IN MOBILITY AND TRUCKING 31
3.7 CONSUMER PERCEPTION ON ADAS, BY REGION 32
3.7.1 CHINA 32
3.7.2 US 33
3.7.3 EUROPEAN UNION 33
3.7.4 INDIA 33
3.7.5 SOUTH KOREA 33
3.7.6 JAPAN 34
3.7.7 MIDDLE EAST 34
4 LEVEL 3 AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES MARKET ASSESSMENT 35
4.1 CURRENT PENETRATION OF LEVEL 3 VEHICLES 35
4.1.1 LEVEL 3 AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES MARKET, BY REGION 36
4.2 REGULATIONS 37
4.2.1 EXISTING REGULATIONS ON AUTONOMOUS DRIVING, BY REGION 37
4.2.2 NCAP REGULATIONS, BY REGION 39
4.2.3 REGULATORY FRAMEWORK, BY REGION 40
4.2.3.1 China 40
4.2.3.2 Japan 40
4.2.3.3 South Korea 40
4.2.3.4 India 40
4.2.3.5 US 40
4.2.3.6 European Union 41
5 COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE 42
5.1 OEM ANALYSIS 43
5.1.1 SELECT PASSENGER CAR MODELS EQUIPPED WITH LEVEL 2 OR ABOVE ADAS SYSTEMS 44
5.1.2 LEVEL 2 AND ABOVE ADAS SYSTEMS OFFERED BY TOP CHINESE OEMS 45
5.1.3 SELECT PASSENGER CAR MODELS EQUIPPED WITH LEVEL 2 OR ABOVE ADAS SYSTEMS 46
5.1.4 COMPARISON BETWEEN LEVEL 3 ADAS SUITES 47
5.1.5 COMPARISON BETWEEN LEVEL 3 ADAS HARDWARE COMPONENTS 48
5.1.6 PLANS OF OEMS FOR DEVELOPMENT OF LEVEL 3 ADAS 48
5.2 MNM INSIGHTS INTO DEVELOPMENTS UNDERTAKEN BY TIER I COMPANIES IN LEVEL 3 ADAS SPACE 50
5.2.1 CURRENT TIER I OFFERINGS FOR LEVEL 3 ADAS 50
5.2.2 CURRENT CHIPSET OFFERINGS BY TOP TIER I COMPANIES 52
5.2.3 ECOSYSTEM INTERCONNECTION FOR LEVEL 3 ADAS SYSTEMS 52
6 RECOMMENDATIONS 54
6.1 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR OEMS 54
6.1.1 PRIORITIZING SCALABLE AND MODULAR E/E ARCHITECTURES 54
6.1.2 INVESTING IN DIFFERENTIATED SENSOR FUSION AND REDUNDANCY 54
6.1.3 DEVELOPING STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIPS WITH TIER I/CHIPSET MANUFACTURERS 55
6.1.4 FOCUSING ON SPECIFIC USE CASES AND REGIONAL ODDS 55
6.1.5 OFFERING FLEXIBLE MONETIZATION MODELS 55
6.1.6 ENSURING CO-DEVELOPMENT WITH REGULATORY AUTHORITIES 56
6.2 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR TIER I COMPANIES 56
6.2.1 FOCUSING ON DEVELOPING LEVEL 3-READY SENSOR SUITE 56
6.2.2 INTEGRATING SENSOR FUSION WITH COMPUTING PLATFORM PACKAGE 56
6.2.3 FOCUSING ON SOFTWARE-DEFINED VEHICLE (SDV) NEEDS OF OEMS 56
6.2.4 FOCUSING ON REGION-SPECIFIC OFFERINGS 56
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE 1 INCLUSIONS & EXCLUSIONS 10
TABLE 2 BASIC DIFFERENTIATION: LEVEL 1 VS. LEVEL 2/2.5 VS. LEVEL 3 13
TABLE 3 TECHNICAL COMPARISON: LEVEL 1 VS. LEVEL 2/2.5 VS. LEVEL 3 13
TABLE 4 EXISTING LEVEL 3 ADAS OFFERINGS BY LEGACY TIER I COMPANIES 16
TABLE 5 LEVEL 3 ADAS: RECENT DEVELOPMENTS 16
TABLE 6 L2+/3 ADAS SYSTEMS: SUBSCRIPTION PACKAGES, PRICING, AND ADAS SUITES OFFERED BY OEMS 19
TABLE 7 LIABILITY CONCERNS FOR MAJOR STAKEHOLDERS 20
TABLE 8 INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITATIONS IN MAJOR COUNTRIES 22
TABLE 9 REGULATORY NORMS MANDATING ADAS FEATURES 23
TABLE 10 REGULATORY NORMS FOR ADAS IN SELECT COUNTRIES 24
TABLE 11 RECENT SENSOR INNOVATION BY TIER I COMPANIES AND THEIR USE CASES 26
TABLE 12 CONSUMER SENTIMENT ON LEVEL 3 ADAS SYSTEMS ACROSS MAJOR MARKETS 34
TABLE 13 LEVEL 3 AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES MARKET, BY REGION, 2022–2024 (‘000 UNITS) 36
TABLE 14 LEVEL 3 AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES MARKET, BY REGION, 2025–2035 (‘000 UNITS) 37
TABLE 15 EXISTING REGULATIONS ON ADAS AND AUTONOMOUS DRIVING, BY REGION 37
TABLE 16 NCAP REGULATIONS, BY REGION 39
TABLE 17 SELECT PASSENGER CAR MODELS EQUIPPED WITH LEVEL 2 OR ABOVE ADAS SYSTEMS, BY OEM, 2024–2025 44
TABLE 18 SELECT PASSENGER CAR MODELS EQUIPPED WITH LEVEL 2 OR ABOVE ADAS SYSTEMS, BY CHINESE OEM, 2024–2025 46
TABLE 19 COMPARISON BETWEEN LEVEL 3 ADAS SUITES, BY OEM 47
TABLE 20 LEVEL 3 ADAS HARDWARE OFFERED BY OEMS 48
TABLE 21 ROADMAP OF MAJOR OEMS FOR ADAS LEVEL 3 48
TABLE 22 TIER I PRODUCT OFFERINGS FOR LEVEL 3 ADAS 51
TABLE 23 CHIP OFFERINGS RELEVANT TO LEVEL 3 ADAS SYSTEMS BY MAJOR PLAYERS 52
LIST OF FIGURES
FIGURE 1 LEVEL 1 TO LEVEL 5 ADAS: ASSISTED VS. AUTOMATED 12
FIGURE 2 LEVEL 3 AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES MARKET: DRIVERS, RESTRAINTS, OPPORTUNITIES, AND CHALLENGES 15
FIGURE 3 CUSTOMER SATISFACTION LEVEL FOR SAFETY SYSTEMS, 2021 VS. 2022 17
FIGURE 4 CONSUMER UNDERSTANDING LEVEL OF SAFETY SYSTEMS, 2021 VS. 2022 18
FIGURE 5 RENESAS ELECTRONICS CORPORATION: SENSOR FUSION WITH DEEP LEARNING 28
FIGURE 6 RENESAS ELECTRONICS CORPORATION: AI-BASED SENSOR FUSION 29
FIGURE 7 ECOSYSTEM MAPPING FOR OVERALL ADAS AND AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES 30
FIGURE 8 COMPUTING UNITS FOR ADAS APPLICATIONS 31
FIGURE 9 ADVANCEMENT TOWARD LEVEL 4 AUTONOMY IN MOBILITY AND TRUCKING 32
FIGURE 10 PENETRATION OF LEVEL 3 AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES AGAINST TOTAL VEHICLE SALES, 2022–2035 (’000 UNITS) 35
FIGURE 11 SALES NUMBERS FOR LEVELS 2/2+ AND 3 AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES,
2022–2035 (’000 UNITS) 36
FIGURE 12 LEVEL 3 AND ABOVE ADAS SYSTEMS: ECOSYSTEM MAPPING 53
FIGURE 13 REDUNDANCY IN MERCEDES-BENZ’S ‘DRIVE PILOT’ 54
MarketsandMarkets(マーケッツアンドマーケッツ)は広範な市場を対象にした市場調査レポートを出版しています。世界中の企業に高い評価を得ており、著名メディアでの引用頻度も高い、インドの最大手級の市場調査会社です。
※MarketsandMarketsの調査レポートはほぼ全タイトルご注文後、最短3時間~12時間以内(営業日基準)にご納品可能です。
ライセンス別価格表
調査会社の事情により予告なしに変更されることがございます。最新の状況およびその他のパターンについてはお問い合わせください。
ライセンスタイプ1
シングルユーザ | マルチユーザ | コーポレート | エンタープライズサイト |
USD4,950 | USD6,650 | USD8,150 | USD10,000 |
ライセンスタイプ2
シングルユーザ | マルチユーザ | コーポレート | エンタープライズサイト |
USD7,150 | USD8,500 | USD9,650 | USD11,000 |
ライセンスタイプ3
シングルユーザ | マルチユーザ | コーポレート | エンタープライズサイト |
USD8,150 | USD9,150 | USD9,650 | USD11,500 |
ライセンスタイプ4
シングルユーザ | マルチユーザ | コーポレート | エンタープライズサイト |
USD9,000 | USD10,500 | USD12,000 | USD13,500 |
ミニレポート ※定性調査にフォーカスした調査レポートです。詳細はお問合せください。
シングルユーザ | コーポレート |
USD 2,650 | USD 4,250 |
ご購入に関するご案内
価格・納期について
- 価格
- ウェブサイトに記載の外貨(定価)を見積日のTTSレートで換算後消費税を加えた金額が弊社からの請求金額になります。見積金額はレート変動に関係なく見積書発行日より2週間有効です。手数料(ハンドリングチャージ)無料。
- ライセンス
- シングルユーザライセンス
- 1名のみレポートファイルのご利用が可能です。
- マルチユーザライセンス
- 同一企業内(関連会社除く)5名までレポートファイルのご利用が可能です。
- コーポレートライセンス
- 同一企業および100%持株会社間・人数無制限でレポートファイルのご利用が可能です。
- エンタープライズサイトライセンス
- 特別ライセンスです。適用範囲についてはお問合せください。
- シングルユーザライセンス
- 納品形態
- Eメール
- 納期
- 最短3時間以内にご納品可能です。通常ご注文後24時間以内(営業日基準)
ご注文方法
- レポートページ内のお問い合わせフォームより見積もりをご請求ください。確認次第見積書と発注書をお送りいたします。既に弊社の見積書をお持ちの場合にはEメールまたはFAXでご注文ください。
その他
- 商品の性質上、ご注文後のキャンセル/返品/交換はできません。ご了承ください。
株式会社SEMABIZはMarketsandMarketsの日本に拠点をおく販売代理店として、MarketsandMarketsのレポートを販売しております。サンプルページのご依頼、見積り、レポートに関するご質問など購入前のご相談はいつでもお気軽にご連絡ください。
最新調査レポート
- 工作機械市場 – 2032年までの世界予測 2025-07-03
- 軟組織修復市場 – 2030年までの世界予測 2025-07-02
- エポキシ樹脂市場 – 2030年までの世界予測 2025-07-02
- スマートガスメーター市場 – 2030年までの世界予測 2025-07-02
- サイバーセキュリティ市場 – 2030年までの世界予測 2025-07-02