世界の遠隔タンク監視市場　第8版

• Insights from numerous interviews with market-leading companies.
• Comprehensive overview of the remote tank monitoring value chain and key applications.
• Summary of the latest industry trends and developments.
• Updated in-depth profiles of 81 key players in this market.
• Reviews of vendor market shares and competitive dynamics.
• Extensive global and regional market forecasts lasting until 2029.

The installed base of connected tanks to reach 31.5 million by 2029

Berg Insight estimates that the global installed base of active remote tank monitoring (RTM) solutions reached 11.3 million units in 2024. Growing at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 22.8 percent, the active installed base is estimated to reach 31.5 million units worldwide in 2029. Berg Insight estimates that the European market accounted for close to 2.6 million active RTM systems at the end of 2024. The North American market is estimated to be larger than the European at around 4.6 million active units. The Asia-Pacific market is moreover estimated to represent an installed base of about 2.7 million RTM systems at the end of 2024. South America and Middle East & Africa are smaller markets having installed bases of 565,000 units and 791,000 units respectively.

There are more than 100 RTM solution vendors active on the market worldwide and this report covers 66 companies. Berg Insight ranks Otodata once again as the leading RTM solution provider in terms of the active installed base worldwide with an installed base of about 3.6 million RTM units. Otodata is based in Canada and primarily focuses on the fuel reseller segment in North America. Otodata has so far acquired 4 companies to boost its growth plans: Wise Telemetry in April 2021, Wireless Applications Corporation (WACnGO) in December 2021, AIUT’s LPG branch in June 2022 and Dunraven Systems in March 2025. Anova and SkyBitz (Ametek) were in second and third place having achieved installed bases of about 1.8 million units and 0.3 million units respectively. Anova has done a string of acquisitions including Independent Technologies, Wikon, ISA – Intelligent Sensing Anywhere, iTank (Sierra Wireless) and Silicon Controls to become the second largest RTM solution vendor with more than 2,000 customers in 80 countries. SkyBitz is based in the US and most of its tanks under management can be found in North America and a few in Mexico and other countries. German FoxInsights and Generac based in the US followed in fourth and fifth place and had installed bases of 180,000 and 130,000 tank monitoring systems respectively. Sensile Technologies, Kingspan, Angus Energy, Gasbot and PowTechnology are also ranked among the largest providers with 70,000–100,000 units each. Other RTM solution providers with installed bases of 30,000–60,000 RTM systems in active use at the end of 2024 include Metasphere, TankScan, Fourdata, Varec, Banner Engineering, FreeWave, OneTank, GreenCityZen, Tecson and Schmitt Measurement Systems.

Table of Contents

Executive Summary

1 Tank Monitoring Solutions

1.1 Introduction to remote tank monitoring
1.2 Remote tank monitoring infrastructure
1.2.1 Tank segment
1.2.2 GNSS segment
1.2.3 Network segment
1.2.4 Backoffice segment
1.3 Tank fleet management
1.3.1 Tank location tracking and level monitoring
1.3.2 Security tracking and intervention
1.3.3 Regulatory compliance and reporting
1.3.4 Health and safety
1.4 Distribution operations management
1.4.1 Optimization of delivery and pick up routes
1.4.2 Inventory management and analytics
1.5 Tank segments and use cases
1.6 Business models and project strategies

2 Market Forecasts and Trends

2.1 Market analysis
2.1.1 The installed base of remote tank monitoring solutions
2.1.2 Remote tank monitoring vendor market shares
2.2 Market drivers and barriers
2.2.1 Macroeconomic environment
2.2.2 Regulatory environment
2.2.3 Competitive environment
2.2.4 Technology environment
2.3 Value chain analysis
2.3.1 Telematics industry players
2.3.2 Tank and level sensor industry players
2.3.3 Telecom industry players
2.3.4 IT industry players
2.4 Future industry trends

3 Company Profiles and Strategies

3.1 European solution providers
3.1.1 AXsensor
3.1.2 Endress+Hauser
3.1.3 FoxInsights
3.1.4 Four Data
3.1.5 GreenCityZen
3.1.6 HMS Networks
3.1.7 Kingspan
3.1.8 Measure Connect Display (MCD)
3.1.9 Metasphere
3.1.10 Nanolike
3.1.11 Oriel Systems
3.1.12 Packwise
3.1.13 Piusi
3.1.14 PowTechnology
3.1.15 Schneider Electric
3.1.16 Sensile Technologies (WIKA)
3.1.17 Siemens
3.1.18 Sigicom
3.1.19 SilentSoft
3.1.20 Sool
3.1.21 Staal Instruments
3.1.22 Tecson
3.1.23 VEGA
3.2 North American solution providers
3.2.1 Agnex
3.2.2 Air Products
3.2.3 Angus Energy
3.2.4 Anova
3.2.5 Asset Monitoring Solutions
3.2.6 Automation Products Group
3.2.7 Badger Meter
3.2.8 Banner Engineering
3.2.9 Digi International
3.2.10 Emerson
3.2.11 FarmChem
3.2.12 FLO-CORP
3.2.13 FreeWave Technologies
3.2.14 Generac
3.2.15 Hoover Circular Solutions
3.2.16 iTankData
3.2.17 Micro-Design
3.2.18 Mopeka
3.2.19 New Boundary Technologies
3.2.20 OleumTech
3.2.21 OneTank
3.2.22 Otodata
3.2.23 Pedigree Technologies
3.2.24 Pulsa
3.2.25 REDtrac
3.2.26 Riot Edge Solutions
3.2.27 Rugged Telemetry
3.2.28 Schmitt Measurement Systems (XACT Monitoring)
3.2.29 SensorTech (Level Devil)
3.2.30 SkyBitz (Ametek)
3.2.31 TankScan
3.2.32 Valarm
3.2.33 Varec
3.2.34 WellAware
3.3 Rest of World solution providers
3.3.1 Farmbot
3.3.2 Farm Monitoring Solutions
3.3.3 Gasbot
3.3.4 Hawk Measurement
3.3.5 HyDip (IOR)
3.3.6 IoT Ventures
3.3.7 Omniflex
3.3.8 Solidat Applied Technologies
3.3.9 Tanktel
3.4 Tank level sensor manufacturers
3.4.1 ABB
3.4.2 AMETEK Level Measurement Solutions
3.4.3 Azbil Corporation
3.4.4 Chuanyi
3.4.5 Flowline
3.4.6 Gems Sensors & Controls
3.4.7 Gobius Sensor Technology
3.4.8 KROHNE Group
3.4.9 LACROIX Group
3.4.10 Pepperl+Fuchs
3.4.11 Rochester Sensors Europe
3.4.12 Senix
3.4.13 Supmea
3.4.14 WIKA
3.4.15 Yokogawa Electric

Glossary

List of Figures

Figure 1.1: Remote tank monitoring infrastructure overview ……….. 4
Figure 1.2: Examples of RTM solutions and liquid level sensors ………. 5
Figure 1.3: Comparison of LPWA technologies …………. 9
Figure 1.4: Comparison of LTE IoT specifications …………. 10
Figure 1.5: Schematic of the remote tank monitoring backoffice segment …….. 11
Figure 1.6: Examples of tank form factors ……………. 15
Figure 2.1: Remote tank monitoring shipments and installed base (World 2024–2029) .. 21
Figure 2.2: Remote tank monitoring installed base by technology (World 2024–2029) … 22
Figure 2.3: Top-20 remote tank monitoring providers, by installed base (World Q4-2024) …. 23
Figure 2.4: Financial data for leading telematics industry players (2024) ……. 28
Figure 2.5: Remote tank monitoring mergers and acquisitions (2015–2025) ……. 29
Figure 2.6: Top 10 mobile operators by reported IoT Connections (World Q4-2024) … 31
Figure 3.1: European solution providers ……………. 35
Figure 3.2: The AXsensor liquid level sensor in a sewage monitoring use case ….. 37
Figure 3.3: The AXsensor liquid level sensor in an IBC use case ………. 37
Figure 3.4: Level sensors from FoxInsights ………….. 39
Figure 3.5: The Maslo Plus sensor ……………. 39
Figure 3.6: The liquid level sensor from Nanolike ………….. 44
Figure 3.7: Sensile Technologies’ Oil Link remote tank monitoring solution …….. 49
Figure 3.8: North American solution providers ………… 54
Figure 3.9: Gremlin heating oil and Propane monitors ………… 57
Figure 3.10: OleumTech wireless oilfield automation ……….. 70
Figure 3.11: The TLM 108 tank level monitoring device from Riot Edge Solutions ….. 73
Figure 3.12: Rest of World solution providers ………… 80
Figure 3.13: Water level sensor from Farmbot …………. 81
Figure 3.14: The Gasbot remote LPG tank monitoring solution ………. 82